The evidence shift
Stanford's revised payroll analysis puts employment for workers ages 22–25 in highly AI-exposed occupations about 19% below the path of comparable less-exposed roles, up from a 15% gap in the earlier data vintage.
AI-Risk.ai is live and evolving. Verified evidence is shown where available; deeper coverage, history, watchlists and alerts are being added.
See what's live →Loading current signals and source-level context…
Published August 12, 2026 · High confidence · source-linked evidence
Stanford's revised payroll analysis puts employment for workers ages 22–25 in highly AI-exposed occupations about 19% below the path of comparable less-exposed roles, up from a 15% gap in the earlier data vintage.
The adjustment is showing up mainly through weaker hiring of younger workers rather than broad economy-wide displacement. That makes entry-level access a more useful early-warning signal than headline layoff counts alone.
Students, recent graduates, early-career professionals, employers and training providers in highly AI-exposed occupations.
Whether the hiring gap keeps widening, stabilizes, or spreads beyond early-career workers — and whether automation-heavy occupations continue to diverge from augmentation-heavy roles.
AI-Risk.ai separates the source from our interpretation so the evidence can be checked independently.